Papers and code
Titles below are the titles used in the program materials or, for the preprint, the title on the author’s ORCID record. Where no file or stable URL was supplied, the page says so in words. Nothing here is a button that pretends to download.
The dissertation title in the program materials is The Digital Judiciary: A Framework for Governing AI-Produced Code Changes and AI-Made Decisions. The SSRN record uses the title above and names both authors. Do not treat them as the same document.
Counts in that paper’s own abstract are not repeated here, so they are not mixed with the later prototype checks on the evidence page.
No PDF, DOI, or archive URL was supplied. Acceptance of that paper, as described, is not an endorsement of this website or of the governance prototypes.
Title as listed on the November 2026 program site. No public manuscript and no editorial decision are linked. An October 2026 deck says a conceptual Enterprise Conscience paper was ready for Philosophy & Technology. That sentence is not matched here to a URL or to a decision, so it is not shown as a status badge.
Title as listed on the November 2026 program site. No public manuscript is linked.
Described there as formal theory of which decisions should bind as precedent. No public manuscript is linked.
Described there as a practitioner survey on who should approve exceptions when agents write the code. No instrument, response count, or public manuscript is linked. The home page therefore does not quote recovery rates for the four exception questions.
Described there as preregistered simulation results comparing governed companies with conventional change control. Confirmatory numbers are not posted. The calibration figures on the evidence page are the figures the November 2026 site already printed, and they are labeled as calibration.
The program materials describe a reference implementation of the three offices, an Enterprise Conscience gate, simulated companies, a year-long simulation harness, conformance and mutation suites, and an installer that checks a build. The author’s public GitHub profile is github.com/avkadambi. It does not list this project.
The path github.com/avkadambi/DigitalJudiciary returned HTTP 404 on 6 November 2026 and is not linked as a download. If the repository is private or has moved, a public URL has not been supplied for this site. No Zenodo DOI and no documentation site were supplied.
Version labels disagree across sources: the August 2026 deck says v5.6, and later website text says v5.16. Neither label is adopted here.
The November 2026 program site describes this as registered on OSF and embargoed, with hypotheses, seeds, margins, and analysis frozen before confirmatory runs. No public OSF URL was supplied, so none is offered.
Described there as a preregistered follow-up and as the code and data archive for the DMAIL workshop paper. No public OSF URL was supplied.
Two decks informed this site and are not posted for download:
They stay off the public site until the author releases them. Posting either deck would also mean deciding whether draft version labels inside the slides should be left as historical slides or revised. This website does not rewrite those files.